
CAEP Conference 2026
🎯 Selling to this event's audience? Get a free tailored buyer list
Tell us your work email and our AI instantly builds a buyer list matched to CAEP Conference 2026 — the best‑fit companies to target, the exact decision‑maker job titles, and the industry filters that fit what you sell.
About this event
CAEP Conference 2026
Important note: To refine the buyer list properly, please share your client website or product page. The best buyer targets for this event depend heavily on what your client sells — for example education services, recruiting, training, software, funding solutions, research tools, or event sponsorships.
This conference is best viewed as an education, advocacy, policy, leadership, and institutional networking event rather than a broad consumer trade show. The strongest value usually comes from reaching education leaders, institutional decision-makers, administrators, faculty, researchers, student-support professionals, and organizations that serve the postsecondary education ecosystem.
Event Overview
- Event title: CAEP Conference 2026
- Event type: Education conference, accreditation, institutional improvement, academic leadership, quality assurance, professional development
- Estimated attendance: Typically a focused professional audience; final footfall depends on host city, partner institutions, and conference programming
- Buyer profile: Education leaders, institutional administrators, academic support teams, policy influencers, service providers to higher education, and professional development vendors
1️⃣ Who attends: Buyers / Attendees
This event attracts professionals connected to education quality, institutional performance, accreditation, student success, leadership development, and program improvement. It is especially useful if your client sells into schools, colleges, universities, training organizations, or education-adjacent service providers.
Main attendee groups:
- School and college administrators
- Deans, department heads, program directors, and academic leaders
- Accreditation and compliance professionals
- Curriculum and instructional design leaders
- Student success, retention, and academic advising teams
- Faculty development and professional learning coordinators
- Institutional research and quality assurance teams
- Education technology vendors and service providers
- Nonprofit and association representatives working in education
- Government, policy, and workforce education stakeholders
The strongest buyer contacts are usually not students. The best value is typically with decision-makers who influence budgets, vendor selection, partnerships, accreditation readiness, and program improvement initiatives.
2️⃣ Where the show is happening + attendee geographic origin
Location: This depends on the confirmed host city for the 2026 edition. If you want, I can further refine this once you provide the official event page or venue details.
Likely attendee geography:
- Primarily regional or national, depending on the association’s membership base
- Strong local attendance from the host state and neighboring regions
- National participation from member institutions, partner organizations, and education service providers
- Possible limited international visibility if the conference includes research, accreditation, or institutional leadership segments
If the conference is hosted in a major education hub, expect stronger attendance from nearby universities, colleges, school systems, professional associations, and policy organizations. If the host city is a major convention destination, national reach usually increases.
3️⃣ Audience reach: Local / National / Global
Most likely reach type: National with regional concentration
This type of conference usually draws a mix of local attendees and nationwide professionals who are interested in education quality, governance, academic standards, and institution-level improvement. It is usually not a mass-market global show, but it can have broad influence within its sector.
Best classification:
- Local: Strong host-city participation
- National: Primary audience category
- Global: Limited or selective, depending on speaker lineup and member affiliations
4️⃣ Sample buyer company names + websites
Below is a sample buyer-target table with organizations that are typically relevant to an education leadership, accreditation, institutional improvement, or professional development event. These are strong prospects if your client sells solutions to education systems, training organizations, or institutional decision-makers.
| Priority | Company | Website | Best Title to Target | Why This is a Good Buyer Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Instructure | instructure.com | VP of Partnerships / Higher Education Sales Director | Strong fit for LMS, student success, and institutional education technology buyers. |
| 2 | Blackboard | blackboard.com | Enterprise Sales Director / Higher Education Account Executive | Serves colleges and universities that attend education leadership and improvement conferences. |
| 3 | Google for Education | edu.google.com | Education Partnerships Manager | Relevant for digital learning, institutional transformation, and campus technology adoption. |
| 4 | Microsoft Education | microsoft.com/education | Education Industry Director | Fits schools, colleges, administrative modernization, and academic technology initiatives. |
| 5 | Canvas by Instructure | instructure.com/canvas | Regional Sales Manager / Higher Education Partnerships Lead | Excellent for learning management and institutional engagement buyers. |
| 6 | Pearson | pearson.com | Higher Education Partnerships Director | Strong buyer fit for academic content, assessment, and education services. |
| 7 | McGraw Hill | mheducation.com | Institutional Sales Director | Relevant for curriculum, academic resources, and learning solutions. |
| 8 | Wiley | wiley.com | Education Solutions Manager | Good fit for academic publishing, learning content, and institutional partnerships. |
| 9 | Cengage | cengage.com | Higher Education Sales Manager | Targets colleges and educators involved in learning outcomes and course materials. |
| 10 | Chegg | chegg.com | Campus Partnerships Manager | Good for student support, digital learning, and education services. |
| 11 | EDUCAUSE | educause.edu | Member Engagement Director | Relevant for higher education IT, institutional leadership, and conference sponsorship. |
| 12 | Anthology | anthology.com | Higher Education Account Executive | Strong fit for student systems, analytics, and education operations buyers. |
| 13 | Turnitin | turnitin.com | Institutional Sales Director | Useful for integrity, assessment, and academic quality stakeholders. |
| 14 | Hobsons | hobsons.com | Education Solutions Consultant | Good for student recruitment, advising, and enrollment workflow buyers. |
| 15 | Kaplan | kaplan.com | Partnerships Manager | Relevant for test prep, professional education, and institutional partnerships. |
| 16 | Coursera | coursera.org | Enterprise Education Partnerships Lead | Useful if the conference includes digital learning, upskilling, or workforce education. |
| 17 | linkedin.com | Education Partnerships Manager | Strong fit if attendees care about career outcomes, professional development, and networking. | |
| 18 | Zoom | zoom.com | Higher Education Sales Manager | Good fit for online teaching, meetings, hybrid learning, and institutional communication. |
| 19 | ZoomInfo | zoominfo.com | Education Vertical Sales Director | Relevant if the conference audience includes recruitment, business development, and market intelligence users. |
| 20 | D2L | d2l.com | Higher Education Account Executive | Excellent fit for learning platforms, institutional transformation, and academic technology buyers. |
Top 5 best samples to send first: Instructure, Microsoft Education, Google for Education, Pearson, and Blackboard. These give you a strong mix of education technology, learning platforms, institutional partnerships, and decision-maker relevance.
5️⃣ Job profiles, industries & event type
This conference is best matched to leadership, academic, operational, and vendor-facing roles inside education institutions and supporting companies.
Best job profiles to target:
- President / Vice President / Chancellor / Provost
- Dean / Associate Dean
- Director of Academic Affairs
- Director of Institutional Effectiveness
- Accreditation Manager / Accreditation Specialist
- Quality Assurance Manager
- Director of Student Success
- Director of Teaching and Learning
- Curriculum Director
- Instructional Design Manager
- Director of Professional Development
- Education Partnerships Manager
- Higher Education Sales Director
- Campus Engagement Manager
- Research Director
- Policy and Compliance Officer
- Learning Technology Manager
- Enrollment or Retention Leader
Best industries to use:
- Education Management
- Higher Education
- Primary/Secondary Education
- Professional Training & Coaching
- Research
- Publishing
- Information Technology & Services
- Computer Software
- Market Research
- Management Consulting
- Staffing & Recruiting
- Public Policy
- Nonprofit Organization Management
- Government Administration
- Events Services
Event type fit: Educational conference, institutional conference, leadership summit, accreditation-focused forum, professional development event, policy and quality improvement event.
6️⃣ Estimated attendance / expected footfall
Without the official 2026 registration figures, the most responsible approach is to treat this as a moderate to high-value professional conference rather than a mass attendance event.
Estimated attendance range:
- Low estimate: 300–500
- Mid estimate: 500–1,000
- High estimate: 1,000+ if the event includes a broad membership base, partner exhibitors, or co-located sessions
The more important metric is usually not raw footfall, but buyer quality. For attendee list sales, the event may be especially valuable if your client wants decision-makers rather than large-volume consumer traffic.
7️⃣ Key focus areas & buyer engagement
This conference should be analyzed around the themes that attract institutional buyers and education stakeholders. These are the most likely engagement categories:
- Accreditation and compliance
- Institutional effectiveness and continuous improvement
- Student success and retention
- Faculty development and teaching excellence
- Curriculum quality and assessment
- Education technology and digital transformation
- Academic leadership and governance
- Policy, standards, and quality frameworks
- Professional learning and training
- Research, evidence, and institutional performance metrics
Buyer engagement angle: If your client wants to market into this event, the messaging should focus on outcomes such as:
- Improving institutional performance
- Supporting accreditation and quality goals
- Increasing student retention and engagement
- Modernizing learning and administrative workflows
- Building partnerships with education leaders
That positioning is usually stronger than a generic “attendee list” pitch because the audience responds better to practical, mission-driven value.
8️⃣ Client product fit note
Please share your client website before finalizing the best buyer list. The ideal targets depend on the client’s product or service category.
Examples:
- If the client sells education software, target higher education IT leaders, LMS buyers, academic operations teams, and digital learning decision-makers.
- If the client sells training or professional development, target deans, faculty development directors, curriculum leaders, and institutional improvement teams.
- If the client sells recruitment or staffing services, target enrollment leaders, career services, workforce development teams, and HR-related education buyers.
- If the client sells publishing or content, target academic leadership, curriculum teams, and instructional design groups.
- If the client sells consulting or advisory services, target accreditation, compliance, quality assurance, and institutional effectiveness leaders.
9️⃣ Industry recommendations from the industry list
For this event, the most useful industry filters are the ones tied directly to education, institutional services, digital learning, and professional support ecosystems.
Recommended industries to prioritize:
- Education Management
- Higher Education
- Primary/Secondary Education
- Professional Training & Coaching
- Research
- Publishing
- Computer Software
- Information Technology & Services
- Management Consulting
- Public Policy
- Government Administration
- Nonprofit Organization Management
- Events Services
- Market Research
- Staffing & Recruiting
Final recommendation
This event is a strong fit if your client wants access to education leaders, institutional buyers, academic decision-makers, and service providers in the education ecosystem. It is especially valuable for campaigns focused on higher education, accreditation, student success, professional learning, and institutional improvement.
Best buyer segments to collect:
- Chancellors, presidents, deans, and academic leaders
- Accreditation and quality assurance professionals
- Curriculum, instruction, and faculty development leaders
- Institutional research and student success teams
- Education technology and publishing vendors
- Professional development and consulting providers
Quality rating for attendee-list sales: 7.5/10
The event is likely valuable because the audience is professional and decision-oriented, but the final quality depends on the exact conference scope, membership base, and whether exhibitors or sponsor organizations are included.
If you share the client website, I can turn this into a sharper buyer list with the best targets matched to the client’s exact product, ideal titles, and best-fit industries.
Data sheet
| Event Name | CAEP Conference 2026 |
| Event Date | June 7–10, 2026 |
| Event Status | Upcoming |
| Venue | RBC Convention Centre |
| City | Winnipeg |
| State / Region | Manitoba |
| Country | Canada |
| Organizer | Organizer name not publicly confirmed from the materials provided. |
| Official Event Website | Official event website not verified from the materials provided. |
| Event Type | Education conference focused on institutional improvement, leadership, quality, professional development, networking, and sector engagement |
| Primary Category | Education & Training |
| Secondary Applicable Categories | Business Services |
| Audience Reach | Likely national with some regional and cross-institutional participation; international reach not confirmed |
| Estimated Attendance / Expected Footfall | Attendance figure not publicly confirmed by the organizer. |
| Attendance Data Reliability | Low for numerical attendance data; event date and venue supplied by user |
| Main Purpose of Event | Professional learning, institutional collaboration, policy and practice exchange, leadership networking, and solution-provider engagement for the education ecosystem |
CAEP Conference 2026 appears, based on the materials provided, to be a focused education-sector conference centered on institutional quality, leadership, academic improvement, policy dialogue, and professional development rather than a mass-market expo. The likely audience includes higher education leaders, administrators, faculty, student support professionals, researchers, and organizations serving the postsecondary or institutional effectiveness ecosystem.
From a commercial perspective, this is most relevant for solution providers that sell into educational institutions or academic networks, including software vendors, training providers, assessment and research tools, consulting firms, workforce development partners, and service organizations that support institutional performance and student outcomes. The event appears stronger for relationship-building and high-value B2B outreach than for broad-volume lead capture.
| Buyer / Attendee Segment | Typical Organizations | Buying Role or Influence | Relevance to Exhibitors / Suppliers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Institutional leadership | Universities, colleges, academic councils, institutional boards | Budget influence, strategic approval, program prioritization | High-value targets for enterprise services, partnerships, and strategic solutions |
| Academic affairs and program quality leaders | Provost offices, deans, accreditation and assessment teams | Direct evaluation of learning, quality, assessment, and improvement tools | Strong fit for analytics, compliance, curriculum, and quality management vendors |
| Student success and support professionals | Student affairs, advising, retention, counseling, accessibility, support units | Influence on student engagement, retention, and service platform adoption | Relevant for student-success software, service models, and support solutions |
| Institutional research and data teams | Research offices, planning units, data analytics groups | Technical and analytical input into reporting, benchmarking, and performance systems | Important for BI platforms, dashboards, surveys, and evidence-based planning tools |
| Professional development and training buyers | HR, learning and development, faculty development centers | Select training content, credentialing, and leadership development programs | Useful for workshops, certification offerings, and coaching services |
| Technology leaders | Campus IT, digital learning, edtech integration offices | Technical gatekeepers for software, infrastructure, security, and data tools | Relevant for SaaS, LMS, analytics, cybersecurity, and integration vendors |
| Procurement and purchasing teams | Institutional procurement, sourcing, contracts offices | Commercial approval, vendor onboarding, and contract execution | Important for conversion after academic and functional team interest is established |
| Education consultants and service providers | Advisory firms, training consultancies, assessment providers | Referral influence and partnership potential | Useful for channel partnerships and co-delivery models |
| Association and policy stakeholders | Sector associations, education advocacy groups, public policy organizations | Influence over sector initiatives, partnerships, and policy conversations | Good fit for thought leadership and ecosystem visibility |
| Geographic Area | Likely Attendee Origin | Buyer Concentration | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winnipeg | Local education institutions, regional administrators, service providers | Medium | Host city should contribute venue-proximate delegates and local institutional participation |
| Manitoba | Provincial higher education stakeholders and related organizations | Medium | Reasonable regional draw for professional education events held in Winnipeg |
| Western Canada | Institutions and associations from Saskatchewan, Alberta, British Columbia | Medium to High | Likely feeder region depending on national membership or association structure |
| National Canada | Universities, colleges, policy stakeholders, sector vendors across Canada | High | Most likely core attendee footprint if the event is a national association conference |
| International | Possible speakers, partners, or education service providers | Low to Medium | International buyer participation not publicly confirmed from the materials provided |
| Reach Level | Assessment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| National | Primary classification | The event profile provided suggests cross-institutional participation from education leaders and service providers across Canada rather than a city-only or provincial-only meeting. |
| Regional | Secondary characteristic | Winnipeg location should naturally increase attendance from Manitoba and nearby provinces. |
| Buyer Company / Organization | Buyer Type | Why It Is Relevant | Website | Best Job Titles to Target | Evidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Manitoba | University | Major host-city institution likely relevant for leadership, quality, student success, and education services outreach | umanitoba.ca | Provost, Dean, Director Institutional Analysis, Director Student Services, Procurement Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| University of Winnipeg | University | Local institution aligned with academic leadership and student-support themes | uwinnipeg.ca | Vice-President Academic, Registrar, Student Success Director, CIO | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Red River College Polytechnic | Polytechnic / College | Relevant buyer for training, learner support, workforce solutions, and institutional systems | rrc.ca | Academic Dean, Director Planning, Director Digital Learning, Sourcing Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Assiniboine College | College | Potential buyer for academic services, student retention tools, and applied learning support | assiniboine.net | Vice-President Academic, Student Experience Director, Procurement Officer | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| University of British Columbia | University | Large national institution with broad needs across assessment, student support, research, and technology | ubc.ca | Associate Provost, Director Institutional Research, Director Procurement, CIO | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| University of Alberta | University | Strong fit for policy, quality assurance, and student experience solution outreach | ualberta.ca | Provost, Dean, Director Teaching and Learning, Strategic Sourcing Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| University of Calgary | University | Relevant for digital transformation, quality improvement, and institutional planning solutions | ucalgary.ca | Vice-Provost, Director Assessment, CIO, Procurement Director | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| University of Toronto | University | High-value national prospect for institutional analytics, training, and strategic services | utoronto.ca | Associate Vice-President, Director Planning, Director Student Success, Category Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| York University | University | Potential buyer for institutional effectiveness, advising, and faculty support solutions | yorku.ca | Dean, Director Academic Quality, Student Experience Director, Purchasing Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| McGill University | University | Relevant for research, academic quality, and student support engagement | mcgill.ca | Associate Provost, Director Analytics, Director Student Services, CIO | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Colleges and Institutes Canada | Association | Sector body relevant for partnerships, ecosystem visibility, and policy-facing outreach | collegesinstitutes.ca | Executive Director, Partnerships Director, Program Director | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Universities Canada | Association | Important for national network access and institutional relationship building | univcan.ca | Director Policy, Partnerships Director, Executive Lead | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Priority | Job Title / Function | Department | Seniority Level | Why This Role Matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Provost / Vice-President Academic | Academic Affairs | C-Level / VP | Shapes institutional strategy, academic priorities, and major solution adoption |
| 2 | Dean / Associate Dean | Faculty / School Leadership | Director / VP | Key buyer or evaluator for faculty-level programs, learning tools, and services |
| 3 | Director of Institutional Research | Planning / Analytics | Director | Critical for reporting, metrics, assessment, and evidence-based decision tools |
| 4 | Director of Student Success / Student Affairs | Student Services | Director | Owns retention, engagement, advising, and support process improvement |
| 5 | Director of Teaching and Learning | Faculty Development / Learning Innovation | Director | Relevant for curriculum improvement, digital learning, and faculty capability programs |
| 6 | Chief Information Officer | Information Technology | C-Level | Approves enterprise technology, integrations, data, and digital transformation initiatives |
| 7 | Director of Procurement | Procurement | Director | Important for contracting, vendor qualification, and purchasing process completion |
| 8 | Strategic Sourcing Manager | Sourcing / Purchasing | Manager | Supports vendor comparison, category evaluation, and purchasing execution |
| 9 | Partnerships Director | External Relations / Partnerships | Director | Strong target for sponsorship, collaborative programs, and sector initiatives |
| Priority | Apollo Industry | Why It Fits the Event | Best Buyer Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Higher Education | Most direct fit for universities and postsecondary institutions | Academic leadership, student success, institutional planning |
| 2 | Education Management | Relevant for education systems, networks, and administrative organizations | Management services, assessment, institutional operations |
| 3 | Professional Training & Coaching | Strong fit for leadership development and faculty/staff training providers | Workshop, certification, executive education sales |
| 4 | E-Learning | Supports digital learning and online academic delivery priorities | LMS extensions, online learning support, course engagement tools |
| 5 | Information Technology & Services | Relevant for campus digital transformation and software procurement | Enterprise platforms, integrations, data management |
| 6 | Computer Software | Applies to solution vendors serving analytics, advising, assessment, and workflow needs | SaaS outreach to institutional buyers |
| 7 | Research | Relevant for institutional effectiveness, surveys, and evidence-based improvement | Research tools, benchmarking, data capture solutions |
| 8 | Government Administration | Useful if ministries, public agencies, or provincial education bodies participate | Policy, grants, and public-sector education engagement |
| 9 | Nonprofit Organization Management | Fits associations, membership bodies, and sector support organizations | Partnerships, thought leadership, and service delivery |
| 10 | Management Consulting | Relevant for advisory firms serving institutional transformation and quality projects | Assessment, strategy, and operational improvement services |
| Metric | Figure | Status | Source / Basis | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated total footfall | Attendance figure not publicly confirmed by the organizer. | Unconfirmed | No official attendance data in provided materials | Conference likely serves a focused professional audience rather than consumer-scale traffic |
| Exhibitor count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | No verified exhibitor prospectus or directory supplied | Likely modest compared with major trade expos |
| Buyer count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | No official delegate segmentation available | Best viewed as a decision-maker and influencer conference, not a formal hosted-buyer event |
| Speaker count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | Agenda not verified from supplied materials | Speaker organizations would improve account-based targeting once published |
| Sponsor count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | No sponsor list verified | Sponsorship roster would help identify solution-provider competition |
| Focus Area | Typical Buyer Need | Buyer Engagement Opportunity | Relevant Supplier Offering |
|---|---|---|---|
| Institutional improvement | Better performance measurement and continuous improvement | Executive conversations around impact, reporting, and outcomes | Assessment platforms, consulting, benchmarking, strategic planning tools |
| Academic quality and assessment | Program review, standards alignment, evidence collection | Functional demos for quality assurance and accreditation-style workflows | Quality management software, assessment tools, review frameworks |
| Student success | Retention, advising, support service efficiency | Target student-affairs leaders and service directors | Advising systems, engagement tools, case management, analytics |
| Leadership development | Skills growth for administrators, faculty leaders, and managers | Workshop sponsorship, session participation, training partnerships | Executive education, coaching, professional development programs |
| Data and analytics | Institutional reporting, dashboards, evidence-based decisions | High relevance for institutional research and planning teams | BI tools, survey software, reporting platforms, data services |
| Digital transformation | Scalable systems, integration, operational modernization | Joint outreach to IT and academic leadership | SaaS platforms, workflow automation, interoperability solutions |
| Partnerships and sector collaboration | External support, alliances, funded initiatives | Network-based outreach and co-branded initiatives | Consulting, grants support, consortium solutions, research collaborations |
| Factor | Assessment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer relevance | High | Strong fit for organizations selling into higher education, academic services, analytics, training, and institutional improvement. |
| Decision-maker availability | High | Likely to attract leaders, directors, and administrators with budget or solution influence. |
| Data collection potential | Medium | Strong if agenda, speakers, sponsors, or attendee directory are published; currently limited by lack of verified public lists. |
| Apollo targeting potential | Very High | Education and institutional decision-makers can be targeted effectively by industry, department, and title. |
| Geographic targeting potential | High | Canada-wide targeting is practical, with additional focus on Manitoba and Western Canada for highest travel probability. |
| Best outreach approach | High | Use value-led messaging around institutional outcomes, student impact, operational efficiency, and leadership priorities. |
| Overall lead quality | High | Good event for account-based outreach and curated lead building, especially for education-focused B2B offers. |
| Best use case | High | Best for senior education decision-maker outreach, partnership development, and targeted attendee list building. |
| Limitations / risks | Medium | Current-year public participation data is limited; event fit depends strongly on what the client sells. |
| Filter Type | Recommended Filters | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Apollo industries | Higher Education; Education Management; Professional Training & Coaching; E-Learning; Information Technology & Services; Computer Software; Research; Nonprofit Organization Management; Management Consulting; Government Administration | Build a broad but relevant target universe around institutional and education-service buyers |
| Departments | Academic Affairs; Student Services; Institutional Research; Information Technology; Procurement; Partnerships; Learning & Development; Operations | Focus on both functional users and commercial approvers |
| Seniority | C-Level; VP; Director; Head; Manager | Prioritize decision-makers and influencers over junior contacts |
| Job titles | Provost, Vice-President Academic, Dean, Associate Dean, Director Institutional Research, Director Student Success, Director Student Affairs, Director Teaching and Learning, CIO, Director Procurement, Strategic Sourcing Manager, Partnerships Director | Reach the most event-relevant roles likely to engage with conference themes |
| Geography | Canada; prioritize Manitoba, Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Quebec | Align outreach with likely national attendee footprint and regional travel patterns |
| Employee size | 201-500; 501-1,000; 1,001-5,000; 5,001-10,000; 10,001+ | Emphasize institutions and organizations with structured budgets and departments |
| Keywords | institutional effectiveness, student success, academic quality, assessment, accreditation, curriculum, advising, retention, learning analytics, digital learning, higher education | Refine to organizations actively aligned with conference themes |
| Technologies | Use only if relevant to client offering, such as LMS, CRM, analytics, BI, SIS, advising, or survey platforms | Useful for software and integration vendors |
| Revenue range | Optional; use mid-market to enterprise where procurement complexity justifies longer sales cycle | Helps prioritize institutions and service organizations with larger spending capacity |
| Company type | Public institutions, private institutions, associations, nonprofit organizations, education service providers | Broadens buyer universe while staying sector-specific |
| Source | Type | What It Verified | Reliability |
|---|---|---|---|
| User-provided event brief | Client-supplied information | Event title, dates, city, country, venue, and baseline market description | Medium for logistics supplied by user; low for unverified organizer and attendance specifics |
| RBC Convention Centre Winnipeg | Venue reference | Venue naming consistency and Winnipeg location context | High for venue identity; event-specific booking not independently verified here |
| Public institutional websites listed in sample buyer table | Organization reference | Existence and relevance of target institutions and associations | High for organization validity; not evidence of current-year event attendance |
🎯 Selling to this event's audience? Get a free tailored buyer list
Tell us your work email and our AI instantly builds a buyer list matched to CAEP Conference 2026 — the best‑fit companies to target, the exact decision‑maker job titles, and the industry filters that fit what you sell.