
10th International Conference on New Trends in Social Sciences
🎯 Selling to this event's audience? Get a free tailored buyer list
Tell us your work email and our AI instantly builds a buyer list matched to 10th International Conference on New Trends in Social Sciences — the best‑fit companies to target, the exact decision‑maker job titles, and the industry filters that fit what you sell.
About this event
10th International Conference on New Trends in Social Sciences
Estimated event positioning: Academic conference focused on emerging research, policy discussion, interdisciplinary scholarship, education, social impact, and institutional collaboration across the social sciences ecosystem.
Likely event type: Academic conference, research forum, higher education networking event, policy and interdisciplinary knowledge-sharing platform.
Important commercial note: This is usually a much more academic and institution-led event than a classic procurement-heavy trade show. That means the strongest professional targets are typically university leaders, research directors, deans, department heads, policy researchers, journal and publishing stakeholders, education-technology teams, think tanks, public-sector research bodies, and nonprofit research organizations rather than traditional exhibition-floor procurement buyers.
1️⃣ Who attends: buyers / attendees
The attendee mix for a conference like the 10th International Conference on New Trends in Social Sciences is generally centered around the academic, research, policy, and education communities. The audience is usually made up of people who either produce knowledge, manage research programs, fund education initiatives, publish scholarly work, or apply social science insights in policy, institutions, and community programs.
Main attendee groups typically include:
- University professors, lecturers, assistant professors, associate professors, and department chairs in social science disciplines
- Deans, academic directors, provost-level stakeholders, and institutional research leaders
- PhD scholars, postdoctoral researchers, and graduate researchers presenting papers
- Policy researchers, think tank analysts, and public-sector program specialists
- NGO, nonprofit, and international development professionals working in social research and impact programs
- Education technology providers serving universities, digital learning, research workflow, and academic collaboration needs
- Academic publishers, journal platforms, conference organizers, indexing services, and research dissemination companies
- Institutional partnerships teams from universities, foundations, and research organizations
- Government-affiliated education, labor, migration, community development, and public policy specialists
- Consultants and advisory firms focused on education, labor markets, inclusion, social policy, and behavioral research
Best buyer-style attendee segments:
Because this is a conference in the social sciences space, the strongest commercially relevant attendees are not general students. The higher-value professional audience is usually found among academic decision-makers, institutional administrators, research management teams, scholarly communications professionals, and organizations that support research, learning, policy development, or social-impact programs.
Most relevant target profiles:
- Dean, Faculty of Social Sciences
- Head of Research / Research Director
- Department Chair, Sociology / Psychology / Political Science / Economics / Anthropology / Education
- Director of Academic Partnerships
- Director of Institutional Research
- Program Director, Social Policy / Public Affairs / Community Impact
- Research Programs Manager
- Scholarly Communications Manager
- Journal Development Manager
- Conference Partnerships Manager
- Director of Digital Learning / Learning Innovation
- Education Partnerships Manager
- Public Policy Director
- Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning Director
- Foundation Program Officer, Education or Social Impact
2️⃣ Where the show is happening + attendee geographic origin
For this conference title, the exact host city and venue can vary depending on the year and organizing body. To finalize venue-level accuracy, we should verify the official event website or organizer page. However, conferences of this type are commonly held in major academic or international meeting destinations in Europe, the Middle East, or globally accessible conference cities.
Typical attendee geographic origin:
- International academic participants from Europe, Asia, the Middle East, North America, and selected African and Latin American institutions
- Regional faculty and researchers from nearby universities and research centers around the host country
- International paper presenters joining for publication, networking, and interdisciplinary exposure
- Remote or hybrid participants if the event offers online presentation tracks
Geographic targeting guidance:
If we are using this event for research and outreach planning, we should think about the audience in three layers:
- Host-country academic institutions — usually the most concentrated local presence
- Regional universities and research bodies — often the largest source of neighboring-country attendees
- Global scholars and institutional collaborators — especially from universities, journals, and interdisciplinary research networks
This makes the event useful when the client wants to reach internationally minded higher education and research stakeholders rather than only one-country commercial buyers.
3️⃣ Audience reach: local / national / global
Audience reach: Primarily global, with strong academic and cross-border participation.
This conference format usually has a broader international knowledge-sharing footprint than a standard domestic business expo. Even when attendance volume is modest compared with major trade shows, the reach is often multinational because researchers travel across borders to present work, publish abstracts, join panels, and build institutional collaborations.
How we would classify the reach:
- Local: Present through host-city universities, local scholars, and nearby institutions
- National: Strong if the host nation has active social science associations and higher education participation
- Global: Usually the defining characteristic, especially if papers, proceedings, and speakers are international
Bottom line: This is not a mass-footfall local fair. It is a lower-volume but more intellectually international event with strong relevance for higher education, research, public policy, publishing, and social-impact sectors.
4️⃣ Sample buyer company names + websites
Below is a practical sample account list of organizations that fit the likely buyer ecosystem around a social sciences conference. These are not random names; they represent the types of institutions and companies that commonly align with academic conferences, research engagement, scholarly communication, digital learning, policy work, and institutional partnerships.
| Priority | Company | Website | Best Title to Target | Why This is a Good Buyer Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Elsevier | https://www.elsevier.com | Journal Development Manager / Conference Partnerships Manager | Strong fit for scholarly publishing, research dissemination, journal partnerships, and conference engagement in social science disciplines. |
| 2 | Springer Nature | https://www.springernature.com | Publishing Editor / Academic Partnerships Manager | Highly relevant for conference proceedings, academic content, editorial partnerships, and research visibility across universities. |
| 3 | Taylor & Francis | https://www.taylorandfrancis.com | Commissioning Editor / Journals Portfolio Manager | Very strong fit in social sciences publishing, journals, books, institutional promotion, and scholarly outreach. |
| 4 | SAGE Publishing | https://us.sagepub.com | Academic Partnerships Manager / Journals Marketing Manager | SAGE is deeply aligned with social science research, methods, journals, and educational resources. |
| 5 | Wiley | https://www.wiley.com | Publisher / Institutional Partnerships Manager | Relevant for research publishing, institutional engagement, and scholarly communication tools. |
| 6 | Pearson | https://www.pearson.com | Higher Education Partnerships Director / Academic Solutions Manager | Good fit for higher education learning solutions, courseware, digital assessment, and university engagement. |
| 7 | Instructure | https://www.instructure.com | Director of Higher Education Partnerships / Regional Education Manager | Strong relevance if the event attracts universities looking at digital learning, online instruction, and academic collaboration platforms. |
| 8 | Blackboard | https://www.blackboard.com | Education Partnerships Manager / Solutions Director | Fits well where conference participants include universities and administrators interested in academic technology and learning management systems. |
| 9 | Coursera | https://www.coursera.org | University Partnerships Manager / Academic Strategy Director | Relevant for higher education collaboration, lifelong learning, digital credentials, and social science program expansion. |
| 10 | Times Higher Education | https://www.timeshighereducation.com | Partnerships Director / University Relations Manager | Strong fit for global higher education networking, institutional branding, rankings, events, and academic partnerships. |
| 11 | QS Quacquarelli Symonds | https://www.qs.com | University Partnerships Manager / Regional Director | Relevant for university outreach, academic reputation programs, internationalization, and institutional collaboration. |
| 12 | RAND Corporation | https://www.rand.org | Program Director / Research Director | Excellent fit from the policy research and applied social science side of the attendee ecosystem. |
| 13 | Brookings Institution | https://www.brookings.edu | Research Program Director / Senior Fellow Operations Lead | Highly aligned with public policy, governance, education, labor, and social impact conversations likely to appear at the conference. |
| 14 | Gallup | https://www.gallup.com | Research Director / Higher Education Partnerships Lead | Strong fit for audience measurement, behavioral research, survey science, workplace studies, and education insights. |
| 15 | Ipsos | https://www.ipsos.com | Research Director / Public Affairs Lead | Relevant for social research, public opinion, policy studies, behavioral analysis, and institutional research engagements. |
| 16 | Kantar | https://www.kantar.com | Insights Director / Research Partnerships Manager | Fits the applied research and data-driven social insight side of the conference audience. |
| 17 | UNESCO | https://www.unesco.org | Programme Specialist / Education Programme Manager | Strong fit if the conference includes education policy, culture, inclusion, global development, and social transformation themes. |
| 18 | World Bank | https://www.worldbank.org | Social Development Specialist / Education Program Manager | Relevant where themes include development policy, labor, education systems, inclusion, poverty, and evidence-based policy. |
| 19 | Open Society Foundations | https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org | Program Officer / Grants Program Manager | Good fit for civil society, social justice, governance, inclusion, rights, and academic-policy intersections. |
| 20 | University of Oxford | https://www.ox.ac.uk | Head of Department / Research Services Manager / Academic Partnerships Lead | Represents the university-side institutional decision-makers who commonly participate in international social science conferences. |
Top 5 sample organizations we would usually prioritize first: Elsevier, Springer Nature, SAGE Publishing, RAND Corporation, and Pearson. This gives a balanced mix of publishing, education solutions, and applied research organizations instead of repeating one single buyer type.
5️⃣ Job profiles, industries & event type
Best job profiles to target:
- Dean, Social Sciences
- Department Chair
- Research Director
- Director of Academic Partnerships
- Institutional Research Director
- Program Director
- Scholarly Communications Manager
- Publishing Editor
- Journal Development Manager
- Conference Partnerships Manager
- Director of Digital Learning
- Higher Education Partnerships Manager
- Public Policy Director
- Research Programs Manager
- Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning Director
- Foundation Program Officer
- University Relations Manager
- Education Strategy Director
Best industry suggestions based on the provided industry list:
- Higher Education
- Education Management
- Research
- E-Learning
- Information Services
- Publishing
- Nonprofit Organization Management
- Public Policy
- International Affairs
- Government Administration
- Professional Training & Coaching
- Market Research
- Management Consulting
- Civic & Social Organization
- Online Media
Best-fit industry combinations by use case:
- For academic and university targeting: Higher Education, Education Management, Research
- For publishers and scholarly content providers: Publishing, Information Services, Online Media
- For policy and development organizations: Public Policy, International Affairs, Nonprofit Organization Management, Government Administration
- For survey, insights, and applied social research firms: Market Research, Management Consulting, Research
- For education technology and academic platforms: E-Learning, Information Technology & Services, Computer Software, Education Management
Event type classification:
This should be treated as an international academic conference rather than a pure commercial trade show. The strongest opportunities come from institutions and organizations that benefit from access to researchers, faculty leaders, policy communities, and academic collaboration networks.
6️⃣ Estimated attendance: expected total footfall
Estimated attendance: Likely in the low hundreds rather than the tens of thousands.
Conferences with this title and structure typically attract a more focused and specialized audience than major trade fairs. Depending on the city, organizer strength, number of paper presentations, and whether there is a virtual component, attendance is often in the range of roughly 150 to 500 participants. In some editions, total participation may be slightly above this if online attendance and co-located academic sessions are included.
Practical planning estimate:
- Conservative estimate: 150–250 attendees
- Mid-range estimate: 250–400 attendees
- Strong international edition: 400–500+ total participants including presenters, panelists, organizers, and institutional delegates
What matters more than raw volume:
For this event, quality matters more than scale. Even if total footfall is far lower than a trade expo, the concentration of researchers, department stakeholders, institutional representatives, and scholarly ecosystem partners can make it valuable for niche higher education, research, publishing, and policy-related offerings.
7️⃣ Key focus areas & buyer engagement
Likely key focus areas:
- Emerging social science research trends
- Education policy and teaching innovation
- Behavioral and cultural studies
- Sociology, psychology, political science, economics, and anthropology intersections
- Migration, inequality, social inclusion, and community development
- Public policy, governance, and social transformation
- Digital society, media, communication, and technology impact
- Research methodology and interdisciplinary collaboration
- Scholarly publication and academic dissemination
- International research networking and institutional collaboration
How buyers engage at this kind of event:
The engagement model here is usually more relationship-driven and intellectually anchored than product-demo heavy. Buyers and partners engage through:
- Panel participation and speaker visibility
- Academic partnerships and memorandum-style institutional collaboration
- Journal promotion, publication pathways, and editorial networking
- Research tools, data resources, software, or learning platform introductions
- University partnership development
- Grant, fellowship, and program collaboration discussions
- Policy and nonprofit research alignment
Best engagement angle:
We should position the audience as a network of academic leaders, social science researchers, university departments, policy experts, publishers, and institutional collaboration stakeholders. That framing is much more accurate and commercially useful than presenting it as a broad business expo audience.
8️⃣ Client-product fit note
To refine the best buyer targets properly, we should review the client website first. Please share the client website, and we will map this event against the client’s product, service, and ideal customer profile. The right target organizations change significantly depending on what the client actually offers.
How the buyer fit changes by client type:
- If the client sells academic publishing, journal, indexing, or conference proceedings services: prioritize publishers, journal editors, scholarly communications teams, and university research offices.
- If the client sells learning technology, LMS, digital classrooms, or online education platforms: prioritize universities, deans, academic technology teams, digital learning leaders, and education administrators.
- If the client sells survey tools, research platforms, analytics, or respondent technology: prioritize research institutes, market research firms, social science departments, policy organizations, and institutional research teams.
- If the client sells nonprofit, public policy, or social impact solutions: prioritize think tanks, foundations, NGOs, international organizations, and public policy centers.
- If the client sells event, membership, or association technology: prioritize conference organizers, academic societies, university consortiums, and research networks.
Best next step from our side: once we receive the client website, we can review the offering and tell you which buyer clusters from this event are strongest, which industries should be prioritized, and which job titles are most likely to convert.
9️⃣ Final recommendation
Overall assessment: This is a strong niche conference for higher education, research, publishing, public policy, and social-impact audiences, but it is not a classic high-footfall corporate trade show. The value lies in the relevance and seniority of the academic and institutional audience, not in massive volume.
Best audience segments to focus on:
- University deans and department heads
- Research directors and academic administrators
- Scholarly publishers and journal managers
- Policy research organizations and think tanks
- Education technology partnerships teams
- Foundations, nonprofits, and international development program stakeholders
- Institutional partnership and conference collaboration teams
Quality rating for B2B relevance: 6.5/10 overall, but this can rise to 8/10 or higher if the client sells directly into higher education, research, policy, publishing, or academic technology.
Main caution: if the client is looking for traditional procurement-heavy commercial buyers from manufacturing, retail, logistics, industrial, or general enterprise sectors, this event may be weaker. If the client serves universities, researchers, publishers, social-impact organizations, or policy institutions, this event becomes much more valuable.
Recommended positioning: We should treat this event as an international social sciences, academic research, and institutional partnership conference with selective but high-relevance professional audiences.
Please share the client website, and we will review it and recommend the best buyer categories, job titles, and industry filters for this specific event.
Data sheet
| Event Name | 10th International Conference on New Trends in Social Sciences |
| Event Date | Date not publicly confirmed from the information available for this review |
| Event Status | Not publicly confirmed from the information available for this review |
| Venue | Venue not publicly confirmed from the information available for this review |
| City | Stockholm |
| State / Region | Stockholm County |
| Country | Sweden |
| Organizer | Organizer not publicly confirmed from the information available for this review |
| Official Event Website | Official event website not verified in the available source set for this review |
| Event Type | Academic conference / research forum / higher education networking event |
| Primary Category | Education & Training |
| Secondary Applicable Categories | Science & Research; Business Services |
| Audience Reach | Likely international academic reach, with strong European participation pattern typical of social science conferences. Current-edition reach not officially confirmed. |
| Estimated Attendance / Expected Footfall | Attendance figure not publicly confirmed by the organizer. |
| Attendance Data Reliability | Low for numerical attendance; moderate for audience-type inference based on event title, format, and standard academic conference structure. |
| Main Purpose of Event | Research presentation, scholarly exchange, interdisciplinary discussion, institutional networking, publication-oriented engagement, and policy or social-impact dialogue across social sciences. |
The 10th International Conference on New Trends in Social Sciences appears to be an academic and institution-led conference focused on emerging research, policy dialogue, interdisciplinary scholarship, education, and social impact themes within the broader social sciences ecosystem. Based on the event title and known location, the likely participant base includes university faculty, research leaders, doctoral scholars, think tanks, journal and publishing stakeholders, nonprofit research organizations, and public-sector institutions involved in education or policy development.
From a commercial perspective, this is more relevant for knowledge services, academic partnerships, research tools, publishing, conference support, education technology, survey platforms, data services, public policy collaboration, and institutional outreach than for traditional procurement-heavy trade show selling. It can be useful for B2B attendee list building when the target audience includes higher education and research decision-makers, but it is typically less effective for general product procurement campaigns unless the offering is specifically aligned with research, education, policy, or institutional operations.
| Buyer / Attendee Segment | Typical Organizations | Buying Role or Influence | Relevance to Exhibitors / Suppliers |
|---|---|---|---|
| University professors, lecturers, and assistant professors | Universities, colleges, business schools, social science departments | Influence over research tools, publications, academic partnerships, conferences, and teaching resources | High for research software, publishing, academic databases, survey tools, and learning platforms |
| Deans, department heads, and research directors | Higher education institutions, research centers | Budget authority or strong approval influence for institutional subscriptions, partnerships, and event participation | Very high-value audience for strategic institutional outreach |
| PhD candidates and postdoctoral researchers | Universities and research institutes | End-user influence over research methods, software, data access, publication services, and conference tools | Useful for long-term demand generation and product adoption |
| Policy researchers and think tank analysts | Think tanks, policy institutes, public-sector research bodies | Influence over commissioned research, data services, advisory work, and policy dissemination | High fit for research intelligence, survey services, and evidence platforms |
| Government and intergovernmental education or social policy representatives | Education ministries, municipal agencies, EU-linked programs, social development bodies | Potential program sponsors, research commissioners, and institutional buyers | Relevant for policy consulting, training, data, evaluation, and impact assessment offerings |
| Journal editors and academic publishers | Scholarly publishers, journals, open-access platforms | Decision-makers for editorial services, submission systems, indexing, and author outreach partnerships | High relevance for publication support, software, peer review, and author services |
| Education technology and academic platform teams | EdTech providers, LMS vendors, research software companies | Partnership-focused and demand-generation oriented rather than direct procurement-led | Useful for partnership sourcing and institutional pipeline development |
| Nonprofit and foundation program leaders | Foundations, NGOs, social impact organizations | Influence over grants, collaborative programs, and research dissemination initiatives | Relevant for funding partnerships, impact reporting, and research collaboration |
| Conference organizers and association leaders | Academic associations, event organizers, professional bodies | Potential buyers of event tech, membership tools, sponsorship services, and attendee acquisition support | Moderate to high depending on service alignment |
| Geographic Area | Likely Attendee Origin | Buyer Concentration | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stockholm | Local universities, policy institutes, municipal and regional stakeholders, research nonprofits | High for host-city academic and policy attendance | Stockholm is a strong hub for higher education, research collaboration, and public-policy dialogue |
| Stockholm County and wider Sweden | Faculty, research centers, public agencies, academic administrators | Moderate to high | Domestic attendance is likely if the event is in-person or hybrid |
| Nordic region | Researchers and institutional leaders from Denmark, Norway, Finland, and Iceland | Moderate | Likely regional draw due to proximity and academic collaboration networks |
| Wider Europe | International scholars, journal contributors, doctoral researchers, think tanks | Moderate to high | European accessibility supports cross-border academic participation |
| Global academic market | Selected delegates from Asia-Pacific, North America, Middle East, and Africa | Selective rather than mass-market | International conference branding suggests global participation potential, but current-year origin mix is not confirmed |
| Reach Level | Assessment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Global | Primary classification, but numerically unverified | The event title indicates an international conference format, which typically attracts cross-border scholars, institutions, and research stakeholders. Actual country mix and delegate volume are not publicly confirmed in the available information set. |
| Regional | Strong secondary likelihood | Nordic and European institutions are likely to form a meaningful share of attendance due to location and academic mobility patterns. |
| Buyer Company / Organization | Buyer Type | Why It Is Relevant | Website | Best Job Titles to Target | Evidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stockholm University | University | Host-city institution with strong social sciences relevance and likely academic interest alignment | su.se | Dean, Head of Department, Professor, Research Director, International Partnerships Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Södertörn University | University | Regional academic institution with social science and public policy alignment | sh.se | Dean, Associate Professor, Program Director, Research Coordinator | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Uppsala University | University | Leading Swedish university with social sciences, education, and policy research capabilities | uu.se | Professor, Head of Department, Research Director, Faculty Administrator | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Lund University | University | Large research institution with significant interdisciplinary and social science activity | lu.se | Dean, Director of Research, Professor, Grants Officer | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| University of Gothenburg | University | Relevant for social sciences, public administration, and policy research outreach | gu.se | Department Chair, Research Director, Senior Lecturer, Faculty Operations Lead | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Karolinska Institutet | Research university | Relevant where the event includes behavioral, public health, policy, or interdisciplinary social research tracks | ki.se | Research Group Leader, Professor, Program Director, Academic Partnerships Lead | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| KTH Royal Institute of Technology | University | Relevant for interdisciplinary policy, society, innovation, and digital transformation themes | kth.se | Research Director, Innovation Partnerships Manager, Department Head | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Swedish Research Council | Government research funding body | Highly relevant for research funding, policy, and institutional collaboration ecosystems | vr.se | Program Officer, Research Officer, Policy Advisor, International Coordinator | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Swedish Council for Higher Education | Government education body | Relevant for internationalization, mobility, academic programs, and higher education cooperation | uhr.se | Program Manager, International Cooperation Lead, Policy Officer | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Stockholm School of Economics | Higher education institution | Relevant for social policy, behavioral science, management, and institutional thought leadership | hhs.se | Program Director, Associate Dean, Research Center Director | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| OECD | Intergovernmental policy organization | Relevant for policy research, education, social development, and comparative social science work | oecd.org | Policy Analyst, Programme Manager, Research Lead | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| UNESCO | Intergovernmental organization | Relevant for education, culture, social inclusion, and policy-facing research programs | unesco.org | Programme Specialist, Research Coordinator, Education Policy Lead | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Priority | Job Title / Function | Department | Seniority Level | Why This Role Matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dean | Academic Leadership | Senior / Executive | Influences faculty priorities, partnerships, event participation, and budget direction |
| 2 | Head of Department / Department Chair | Academic Department | Director / Senior | Controls departmental adoption of tools, conference engagement, and research collaboration |
| 3 | Research Director | Research | Director | Key buyer or influencer for research platforms, data, and collaborative services |
| 4 | Professor / Associate Professor | Faculty | Senior / Mid-Senior | Strong end-user influence for scholarly products and research workflows |
| 5 | Program Director | Academic Programs | Director / Manager | Relevant for curriculum-linked partnerships and conference or speaker engagement |
| 6 | Policy Analyst / Policy Researcher | Policy / Research | Mid-Senior | Relevant for policy evidence tools, data services, and commissioned studies |
| 7 | International Partnerships Manager | Partnerships / External Relations | Manager / Director | Important for cross-border academic collaboration and institutional sponsorship opportunities |
| 8 | Journal Editor / Editorial Director | Publishing / Editorial | Senior | Relevant for publication services, peer review systems, indexing, and academic marketing |
| 9 | Grants Officer / Research Funding Manager | Research Administration | Manager | Relevant when selling grant support, proposal software, impact tracking, or institutional services |
| 10 | Academic Technology Director | IT / Digital Learning | Director / Manager | Useful for EdTech, conference platforms, LMS integration, and data systems |
| Priority | Apollo Industry | Why It Fits the Event | Best Buyer Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Higher Education | Core audience for social science conferences | Faculty outreach, institutional partnerships, research subscriptions |
| 2 | Research | Research institutes and social science centers are likely participants | Data services, collaboration tools, knowledge platforms |
| 3 | Education Management | Relevant for administrators and institutional operations leaders | Program management, partnerships, academic administration tools |
| 4 | Government Administration | Public-sector research and education stakeholders may attend | Policy, program evaluation, impact reporting, research commissioning |
| 5 | Public Policy | Strong fit for policy research, applied social science, and evidence-based governance | Research partnerships, consulting, policy dissemination |
| 6 | Nonprofit Organization Management | NGOs and foundations use social science evidence for programs and grants | Impact studies, program design, stakeholder engagement |
| 7 | Professional Training & Coaching | Relevant for executive education, workshops, and faculty development offerings | Training partnerships and certificate programs |
| 8 | E-Learning | Useful for digital learning and hybrid conference-related educational delivery | LMS, digital content, remote participation support |
| 9 | Publishing | Journal and scholarly communication stakeholders are relevant | Editorial systems, abstract management, author services |
| 10 | Information Services | Academic databases, indexing, and research intelligence providers fit well | Institutional content subscriptions and insights platforms |
| 11 | Management Consulting | Advisory firms with education and policy practices may be relevant | Institutional strategy, evaluation, public-sector consulting |
| 12 | International Trade & Development | Some social science conferences attract development and social impact organizations | Program evaluation, socioeconomic research, collaboration initiatives |
| Metric | Figure | Status | Source / Basis | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated total footfall | Attendance figure not publicly confirmed by the organizer. | Unconfirmed | No verified organizer attendance count available in the reviewed information set | Academic conferences of this type often have narrower delegate counts than major expos, but no reliable estimate should be asserted without official evidence |
| Exhibitor count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | No verified exhibitor directory identified | This type of event may have limited or no traditional exhibit hall |
| Buyer count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | No official buyer program evidence available | Buyer definition here is institutional, academic, policy, and partnership-oriented rather than trade procurement-led |
| Speaker count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | Agenda not verified in the available source set | Likely includes presenters, panelists, and session chairs |
| Sponsor count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | No sponsor listing verified | Sponsorship may exist in a limited academic format |
| Historical attendance | Historical attendance not publicly confirmed in this review | Historical / prior-year evidence unavailable | No prior-year official attendance figure verified | Further organizer-source verification recommended before using this event for volume-based list pricing |
| Focus Area | Typical Buyer Need | Buyer Engagement Opportunity | Relevant Supplier Offering |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interdisciplinary social science research | Access to tools, datasets, collaboration platforms, and publication visibility | Research platform demos, trial access, abstract-management support | Research software, survey tools, data repositories, literature platforms |
| Policy and social impact | Evidence generation, evaluation methods, reporting, and stakeholder dissemination | Policy roundtables, commissioned research discussions, impact measurement conversations | Impact assessment, policy consulting, data analytics, visualization services |
| Higher education collaboration | Partnerships, exchange programs, faculty networking, grant collaboration | Institutional meetings, MoU discussions, partnership introductions | Partnership services, mobility platforms, co-research facilitation |
| Publishing and dissemination | Journal access, editorial systems, open access support, author engagement | Publisher networking, submission system showcases, indexing discussions | Publishing solutions, peer review software, indexing, conference proceedings support |
| Education innovation | Modern teaching delivery, student engagement, hybrid learning support | EdTech outreach, institutional pilot projects, faculty training discussions | E-learning, learning analytics, digital classrooms, content platforms |
| Nonprofit and foundation research use | Program evaluation, grant impact evidence, beneficiary insight | Project collaboration, evaluation partner discussions, framework design | Monitoring and evaluation, research advisory, fieldwork support |
| Factor | Assessment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer relevance | Medium to High | High if selling to universities, research institutions, publishers, policy organizations, or EdTech. Lower for general commercial products. |
| Decision-maker availability | Medium | Senior academics and research leaders may attend, but many delegates are presenters rather than direct procurement owners. |
| Data collection potential | Medium | Useful if speaker lists, committee lists, or institutional affiliations are published. Less useful if attendee information is restricted. |
| Apollo targeting potential | High | The event maps clearly to higher education, research, policy, publishing, and nonprofit sectors that can be filtered in Apollo. |
| Geographic targeting potential | High | Strong for Stockholm, Sweden, Nordics, and wider Europe-based account clusters. |
| Best outreach approach | High-touch thought leadership outreach | Best results likely from research value propositions, collaborations, institutional credibility, and case-study-led messaging. |
| Overall lead quality | Medium | Good quality for niche B2B academic and institutional offerings; not ideal for broad transactional sales campaigns. |
| Best use case | Institutional prospecting and partnership development | Best suited for university outreach, research tools, publishing, academic services, policy engagement, and collaboration-led business development. |
| Limitations / risks | Medium | Attendance and sponsor data are not currently verified, and procurement intensity is typically lower than at a commercial expo. |
| Filter Type | Recommended Filters | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Apollo industries | Higher Education; Research; Education Management; Government Administration; Public Policy; Nonprofit Organization Management; Publishing; Information Services; E-Learning; Professional Training & Coaching | Capture the most likely institutional attendee and buyer universe |
| Departments | Education, Research, Operations, Information Technology, Program Management, Partnerships, Editorial, Strategy | Focus on academic, institutional, and policy-facing functions |
| Seniority | Director, VP, Head, Manager, Partner, CXO, Owner where relevant | Prioritize budget owners and senior influencers |
| Job titles | Dean, Head of Department, Department Chair, Research Director, Professor, Associate Professor, Program Director, Policy Analyst, Journal Editor, Editorial Director, Grants Manager, Academic Partnerships Manager, Director of Learning Technology | Match event stakeholder roles with institutional decision pathways |
| Geography | Sweden; Stockholm County; Nordics; Western Europe; selected global academic markets | Layer local, regional, and broader international targeting |
| Employee size | 51-200; 201-500; 501-1,000; 1,001-5,000; 5,001+ | Focus on established institutions, research bodies, and publishers |
| Keywords | social sciences, policy research, interdisciplinary research, higher education, academic conference, journal publishing, qualitative research, public policy, research collaboration, grants, social impact | Refine list quality toward event-relevant organizations |
| Revenue range | Use selectively; not essential for public universities or government bodies | Avoid over-restricting public and nonprofit accounts |
| Company type | Educational Institution, Government, Nonprofit, Publisher, Research Organization | Improves buyer-side precision |
| Technologies | Use only if selling EdTech, research software, or digital learning solutions | Useful for installation-based targeting of compatible institutions |
| Source | Type | What It Verified | Reliability |
|---|---|---|---|
| User-provided event brief | Provided input | Event title, city, country, and general positioning as an academic social sciences conference | Moderate |
| Official organizer / event site | Primary source | Current-year date, venue, organizer, agenda, sponsors, speakers, and attendee list should be verified here before final sales deployment | High when available; not verified in this review |
| Stockholm University | Institutional website | Validated host-city higher education relevance for prospecting logic | High |
| Swedish Research Council | Government body website | Validated Sweden-based research funding ecosystem relevance | High |
| Swedish Council for Higher Education | Government body website | Validated higher education and international cooperation ecosystem relevance | High |
| OECD and UNESCO | Institutional websites | Used only as market-fit references for policy and education stakeholder profiling; not as attendance proof | High for organizational relevance; low for event attendance proof |
| Verification note | Research caution | No current-year official attendee list, exhibitor directory, sponsor page, agenda, organizer page, or venue confirmation was available in the reviewed input set. This report therefore distinguishes probable buyer profile from confirmed participation. | High |
🎯 Selling to this event's audience? Get a free tailored buyer list
Tell us your work email and our AI instantly builds a buyer list matched to 10th International Conference on New Trends in Social Sciences — the best‑fit companies to target, the exact decision‑maker job titles, and the industry filters that fit what you sell.