
ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition 2026
🎯 Selling to this event's audience? Get a free tailored buyer list
Tell us your work email and our AI instantly builds a buyer list matched to ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition 2026 — the best‑fit companies to target, the exact decision‑maker job titles, and the industry filters that fit what you sell.
About this event
ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition 2026
Event type: Engineering education, higher education, academic leadership, curriculum development, research, student engagement, industry-academia collaboration, education technology, and exhibition
Estimated attendance: Typically several thousand attendees, with a strong mix of engineering faculty, deans, department chairs, academic researchers, industry partners, STEM program leaders, and education solution providers. This is a high-value B2B and academic decision-maker event, especially for companies selling education technology, lab equipment, research tools, campus solutions, recruitment services, and engineering training products.
Audience profile: The event attracts a highly targeted audience centered on engineering education and workforce development. Compared with general education conferences, this one is much more specialized and much more valuable for vendors who want to reach people with purchasing influence in colleges, universities, research programs, and engineering departments.
1️⃣ Who attends: Buyers / Attendees
This conference is not a broad consumer event. It is a specialized gathering of professionals who influence curriculum, research, program investment, lab modernization, student engagement, and academic-industry partnerships. The buyer value comes from the fact that many attendees are decision-makers or strong influencers inside universities, engineering schools, research centers, and STEM education organizations.
Main attendee groups include:
- Engineering professors, lecturers, and faculty members
- Department chairs, associate deans, and deans of engineering
- Curriculum designers and academic program directors
- STEM education leaders and undergraduate research coordinators
- University administrators and institutional buyers
- Education technology providers and lab equipment suppliers
- Industry partners looking to recruit engineers or fund academic collaboration
- Accreditation, assessment, and quality improvement professionals
- Graduate program leaders and research administrators
- Career services, internship, and co-op program managers
From a buyer-list perspective, the strongest contacts are not just general attendees. The most valuable records are those tied to purchasing authority, partnership development, research support, curriculum planning, and institutional procurement.
2️⃣ Where the show is happening + attendee geographic origin
Location: The 2026 conference location should be confirmed from the official event page before final targeting. Once the venue is announced, it is important to map the geography of attendees around that host city because these events usually have strong regional travel behavior in addition to national draw.
Attendee origin: This event draws a primarily national U.S. audience, with some international participation from academic institutions, research collaborators, and education solution providers. The largest concentration is usually from the United States, but because engineering education is globally connected, the audience can also include attendees from Canada, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East through partner universities and research networks.
Geographic targeting guidance:
- Local / regional: Attendees from the host city and surrounding metro area usually include nearby universities, engineering schools, and local industry sponsors.
- National: This is the strongest segment, because engineering educators and academic leaders travel from across the U.S.
- Global: Limited but important, especially for university collaborations, international exchange programs, and multinational education vendors.
3️⃣ Audience reach
Reach type: National with selective global influence
This event is not local in nature. It carries national reach because it brings together engineering education stakeholders from universities and colleges across the country. It also has global credibility due to the importance of engineering education worldwide. That said, the core buyer pool is strongest in the U.S. higher education market.
For list-selling purposes, the event is best framed as a national higher-education engineering decision-maker event with targeted global relevance.
4️⃣ Sample buyer company names + websites
Below is a sample buyer table with companies and organizations that are highly relevant for this event. These are not random names; they are likely to have strong interest in engineering education, research, campus technology, lab modernization, or student pipeline development.
| Priority | Company | Website | Best Title to Target | Why This is a Good Buyer Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Siemens | siemens.com | Education Partnerships Manager / University Relations Manager | Strong fit for engineering education, digital industries, automation, and university collaboration. |
| 2 | Dassault Systèmes | 3ds.com | Academic Program Manager / Education Sales Director | Highly relevant for CAD, simulation, design engineering, and curriculum support in universities. |
| 3 | MathWorks | mathworks.com | Higher Education Account Manager / Academic Program Manager | Used heavily in engineering teaching, research, modeling, and simulation. |
| 4 | National Instruments | ni.com | University Partnerships Manager / Technical Sales Manager | Excellent fit for lab systems, test and measurement, and engineering education. |
| 5 | TE Connectivity | te.com | Talent Pipeline Manager / University Relations Lead | Engineering-heavy company with strong interest in early talent and university engagement. |
| 6 | Keysight Technologies | keysight.com | Education Solutions Manager / Academic Sales Specialist | Great fit for electronics, testing, instrumentation, and engineering labs. |
| 7 | Texas Instruments | ti.com | University Recruiting Manager / STEM Outreach Manager | Strong engineering education and student outreach brand with broad academic relevance. |
| 8 | Analog Devices | analog.com | Academic Programs Manager / Technical Marketing Manager | Good fit for electronics education, semiconductors, and engineering curriculum support. |
| 9 | Microsoft | microsoft.com | Higher Education Account Executive / Education Partnership Manager | Relevant for campus software, cloud, AI, developer training, and research computing. |
| 10 | Intel | intel.com | University Relations Manager / STEM Program Manager | Strong engineering and research ecosystem presence with higher education recruiting needs. |
| 11 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise | hpe.com | Education Industry Manager / Campus Solutions Manager | Relevant for research computing, campus IT, labs, and academic infrastructure. |
| 12 | 3M | 3m.com | University Relations Manager / Engineering Talent Acquisition Manager | Useful for recruiting engineers and promoting innovation-focused partnerships. |
| 13 | Honeywell | honeywell.com | Campus Recruiting Manager / Early Careers Lead | Engineering, automation, and research-heavy company with strong student pipeline interest. |
| 14 | Caterpillar | cat.com | University Relations Specialist / Engineering Development Manager | Relevant for mechanical, industrial, and civil engineering hiring and partnerships. |
| 15 | Schneider Electric | se.com | Training Solutions Manager / Academic Partnerships Lead | Strong fit for energy, automation, sustainability, and technical workforce development. |
| 16 | Autodesk | autodesk.com | Education Programs Manager / Academic Customer Success Manager | One of the best fits for engineering design, architecture, product development, and student adoption. |
| 17 | Cadence Design Systems | cadence.com | Academic Engagement Manager / University Relations Lead | Strong for electrical engineering, chip design, and research partnerships. |
| 18 | National Science Foundation | nsf.gov | Program Director / Research Program Manager | Key stakeholder for research funding, STEM programs, and engineering education initiatives. |
Top 5 sample accounts to lead with: Siemens, MathWorks, National Instruments, Autodesk, and Texas Instruments. These names are strong because they connect directly to engineering education, research tools, student engagement, and university partnerships.
5️⃣ Job profiles, industries & event type
This event is highly specialized. The best contacts are not broad marketing titles alone; they are people who manage academic, technical, research, and education-related programs. It is a strong event for targeting both buyers and influencers.
Best job profiles to target:
- Dean of Engineering
- Associate Dean
- Department Chair
- Professor / Associate Professor / Lecturer
- Director of Engineering Education
- Academic Program Director
- Curriculum Development Manager
- University Relations Manager
- Education Partnerships Manager
- STEM Outreach Manager
- Research Program Director
- Lab Manager
- Higher Education Sales Manager
- Campus Recruiting Manager
- Instructional Technology Manager
- Assessment and Accreditation Lead
- Director of Innovation / Learning Technologies
Best industries to use for targeting:
- Higher Education
- Education Management
- Professional Training & Coaching
- Research
- Information Technology & Services
- Computer Software
- Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
- Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
- Semiconductors
- Industrial Automation
- Medical Devices
- Defense & Space
- Aviation & Aerospace
- Management Consulting
- Market Research
- Staffing & Recruiting
- Events Services
Event type: This is a hybrid of conference, exposition, academic networking event, education marketplace, and research collaboration platform.
6️⃣ Estimated attendance / expected footfall
The expected footfall is usually in the several-thousand range, with a concentration of highly relevant attendees rather than large mass-market volume. The real value is not just the number of people, but the quality of the audience.
Why the attendance matters:
- Engineering faculty and academic leaders often have budget influence.
- University buyers can purchase software, equipment, and services at scale.
- Industry partners attend to recruit talent and form academic collaborations.
- Exhibitors often include premium vendors in education, research, and engineering.
Estimated total attendance: Several thousand, with strong decision-maker density.
Buyer density: High, especially for education technology, engineering software, lab tools, research services, and campus solutions.
7️⃣ Key focus areas & buyer engagement
This event is especially attractive for companies and services that support engineering education, hands-on learning, faculty development, student career preparation, research infrastructure, and university-industry partnerships.
Key focus areas include:
- Engineering curriculum innovation
- STEM pipeline and student success
- Research and academic collaboration
- Accreditation and assessment
- Lab modernization and educational equipment
- Simulation, modeling, and design software
- Faculty development and instructional tools
- Graduate and undergraduate research support
- Industry partnerships and sponsored projects
- Workforce readiness for engineering careers
Buyer engagement angle: The strongest outreach message should focus on how your offering helps institutions improve engineering learning outcomes, support faculty, modernize labs, increase student engagement, or strengthen career placement and research capacity.
For example, if your client sells education solutions, the value proposition is often:
“We help engineering schools reach faculty, department leaders, and academic buyers who are looking for tools to improve teaching, research, lab performance, and student career readiness.”
8️⃣ Client product fit note
To give you the most accurate buyer recommendation, I need your client website before finalizing the best buyer accounts. The best target list changes significantly depending on what your client sells.
Examples of how the target list changes by product:
- If the client sells engineering software: target deans, department chairs, curriculum directors, and university IT/education technology leaders.
- If the client sells lab equipment or hardware: target lab managers, engineering faculty, research directors, and procurement-influencing administrators.
- If the client sells recruitment or staffing services: target campus recruiting, university relations, and early-career hiring teams at engineering firms.
- If the client sells training or educational content: target academic program directors, faculty development leaders, and STEM curriculum teams.
- If the client sells cloud, AI, or digital transformation tools: target research computing, education technology, and innovation leaders in higher education.
Best next step: Please share your client website so I can review it and recommend the most relevant buyer companies, job titles, and event fit based on the actual product.
9️⃣ Recommended industry targeting
Based on the event theme and the available industry categories, the most relevant industries are:
- Higher Education
- Education Management
- Professional Training & Coaching
- Research
- Computer Software
- Information Technology & Services
- Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
- Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
- Semiconductors
- Industrial Automation
- Defense & Space
- Aviation & Aerospace
- Medical Devices
- Management Consulting
- Staffing & Recruiting
- Events Services
If you want the highest-quality lead list, the strongest mix is usually higher education + engineering software + lab equipment + research tools + university relations + campus recruiting.
Final recommendation
This is a very strong event for attendee-list and buyer-intent analysis if your client sells into higher education, engineering schools, research institutions, campus technology, or technical training environments. It is not a mass-market show, but it is a high-value niche event with strong decision-maker concentration.
Best buyer segments to collect:
- Engineering faculty and department leaders
- University deans and academic administrators
- Research directors and lab managers
- Higher education procurement influencers
- University relations and campus recruiting teams
- Education technology and engineering software vendors
- Industry partners sponsoring STEM and research initiatives
Overall B2B lead quality rating: 8.5/10
The only limitation is that this is a specialized academic event, so the list must be carefully filtered to prioritize people with budget influence, partnership responsibility, or purchasing authority. If you share the client website, I can turn this into a much sharper buyer list with exact company matches, best titles, and the strongest industry filters for outreach.
Data sheet
| Event Name | ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition 2026 |
| Event Date | June 21–24, 2026 |
| Event Status | Ongoing |
| Venue | Charlotte, USA; exact venue should be verified on the official event page |
| City | Charlotte |
| State / Region | North Carolina |
| Country | United States |
| Organizer | American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) |
| Official Event Website | asee.org |
| Event Type | Annual conference and exposition focused on engineering education, academic leadership, curriculum development, research dissemination, student engagement, and industry-academia collaboration |
| Primary Category | Education & Training |
| Secondary Applicable Categories | Science & Research; IT & Technology; Industrial Engineering |
| Audience Reach | National, with selective international academic and industry participation |
| Estimated Attendance / Expected Footfall | Typically several thousand attendees based on historical conference scale; current-year figure not publicly confirmed in the reviewed materials |
| Attendance Data Reliability | Estimated; Attendance figure not publicly confirmed by the organizer |
| Main Purpose of Event | To convene engineering educators, academic leaders, researchers, institutional decision-makers, and solution providers for program improvement, faculty exchange, research presentation, product evaluation, and partnership development |
The ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition is one of the most recognized U.S. gatherings dedicated specifically to engineering education. It brings together engineering faculty, deans, department chairs, researchers, student-success leaders, accreditation-minded stakeholders, and industry partners that support engineering programs, laboratories, digital learning, and workforce development.
From a commercial and lead-generation perspective, the event matters because it is more specialized than a broad higher-education show. The audience is concentrated around engineering colleges, STEM initiatives, curriculum investment, lab modernization, educational technology, research tools, and university-industry collaboration. That makes it relevant for vendors targeting institutional buyers and senior academic influencers rather than general consumer attendees.
| Buyer / Attendee Segment | Typical Organizations | Buying Role or Influence | Relevance to Exhibitors / Suppliers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering deans and associate deans | Universities, colleges of engineering, public and private institutions | Set strategic direction, budget priorities, program investment, and vendor approvals | High-value targets for institution-wide solutions, labs, platforms, and partnerships |
| Department chairs and program directors | Mechanical, electrical, civil, chemical, computer, and multidisciplinary engineering departments | Influence curriculum choices, teaching tools, software, and equipment selection | Strong buyers for courseware, lab kits, assessment tools, and training solutions |
| Faculty and instructional leaders | Professors, lecturers, instructional design teams, teaching innovation centers | Recommend tools, pilot programs, content platforms, and teaching technologies | Useful for product trials, departmental adoption, and peer-led advocacy |
| Research and lab leaders | Research centers, faculty labs, engineering innovation programs | Specify equipment, data systems, instrumentation, and research-support services | Relevant for lab technology, simulation, testing, and research workflow vendors |
| Academic procurement and purchasing stakeholders | University procurement, purchasing offices, grants administration, shared services | Commercial evaluation, contract compliance, sourcing, and institutional buying process control | Important for closing transactions after faculty or dean-level interest |
| Student success and experiential learning leaders | Career centers, first-year engineering programs, co-op and internship offices | Influence adoption of engagement, retention, and workforce-readiness solutions | Relevant for assessment, advising, experiential learning, and employer-connection platforms |
| Industry-academia partnership leaders | Corporate relations teams, sponsored research offices, foundation and external affairs units | Build collaboration programs, sponsorships, internships, and applied research relationships | Good targets for workforce development, recruitment, and partnership solutions |
| Education technology and platform evaluators | Instructional technology offices, academic IT, LMS and digital learning teams | Assess scalability, integration, data visibility, and learning outcomes | Highly relevant for SaaS, analytics, assessment, and digital course delivery providers |
| Accreditation, assessment, and quality leaders | Program assessment offices, ABET-aligned units, institutional effectiveness teams | Influence evidence collection, outcomes reporting, and continuous improvement systems | Relevant for assessment software, reporting tools, and curriculum mapping solutions |
| Corporate sponsors and engineering employers | Technology, industrial, aerospace, manufacturing, and engineering-service companies | Seek recruiting pipelines, brand visibility, faculty relationships, and research access | Useful for partnership, sponsorship, and workforce-development offerings |
| Geographic Area | Likely Attendee Origin | Buyer Concentration | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Host city | Charlotte | Local universities, regional academic leaders, nearby employers | Charlotte provides strong air access and regional convenience for Southeastern attendees |
| Host state / region | North Carolina and the broader Southeast | Engineering colleges, research universities, STEM programs | Likely concentration from NC, SC, GA, VA, TN, and neighboring states |
| Nearby business hubs | Research Triangle, Atlanta, Washington DC corridor, Nashville, Orlando, Florida university markets | High concentration of engineering programs and employer partnerships | Good prospecting overlap for academic technology and engineering workforce solutions |
| National reach | U.S.-wide academic institutions and engineering educators | Very high | ASEE is a national professional society, so attendance is not limited to the Southeast |
| International reach | Selective international faculty, researchers, and academic collaborators | Moderate | International profile is present but secondary to the core U.S. higher-education audience |
| Reach Level | Assessment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| National | Primary classification | ASEE is a U.S. national association and its annual conference typically attracts decision-makers from engineering colleges, departments, and partner organizations across the country. |
| International | Secondary reach | The conference has meaningful international academic relevance, but the strongest buyer concentration remains U.S.-based higher education and engineering education stakeholders. |
| Buyer Company / Organization | Buyer Type | Why It Is Relevant | Website | Best Job Titles to Target | Evidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Purdue University College of Engineering | University engineering school | Large engineering institution with strong teaching, lab, and curriculum investment potential | engineering.purdue.edu | Dean, Associate Dean, Department Chair, Director of Labs, Procurement Manager | Prior-Year Participation Evidence |
| Georgia Institute of Technology | University engineering and STEM buyer | High-value prospect for engineering education tools, digital learning, and research-adjacent solutions | gatech.edu | Associate Dean, Chair, Academic Program Director, Lab Director, IT Director | Prior-Year Participation Evidence |
| Virginia Tech College of Engineering | University engineering school | Relevant for curriculum platforms, simulation tools, and experiential learning products | eng.vt.edu | Dean, Department Head, Director of Undergraduate Programs, Procurement Lead | Prior-Year Participation Evidence |
| Texas A&M University College of Engineering | University engineering buyer | Large engineering ecosystem with potential need for labs, software, and student engagement solutions | engineering.tamu.edu | Dean, Department Chair, Program Director, Research Administrator | Prior-Year Participation Evidence |
| University of Michigan College of Engineering | University engineering school | Represents a strong institutional buyer for academic technology and engineering education services | engin.umich.edu | Dean, Director of Education Innovation, Department Chair, Lab Operations Manager | Prior-Year Participation Evidence |
| Penn State College of Engineering | University engineering buyer | Potential buyer for teaching platforms, labs, and student outcome solutions | engr.psu.edu | Dean, Associate Dean, Department Head, Assessment Director | Prior-Year Participation Evidence |
| North Carolina State University College of Engineering | University engineering school | Strong geographic relevance to the host state and common engineering education procurement fit | engr.ncsu.edu | Dean, Chair, Lab Director, Director of Student Programs | Prior-Year Participation Evidence |
| Clemson University College of Engineering, Computing and Applied Sciences | University engineering school | Likely alignment with hands-on engineering education, labs, and workforce-development solutions | cecas.clemson.edu | Dean, Department Chair, Facilities Director, Industry Partnerships Director | Prior-Year Participation Evidence |
| Arizona State University Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering | University engineering buyer | Strong fit for scalable digital learning, student engagement, and innovation partnerships | engineering.asu.edu | Dean, Executive Director, Online Learning Director, Procurement Lead | Prior-Year Participation Evidence |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology School of Engineering | University engineering and research buyer | Relevant for advanced education technology, lab systems, and research-support offerings | engineering.mit.edu | Dean, Program Director, Lab Director, Academic Technology Leader | Prior-Year Participation Evidence |
| Priority | Job Title / Function | Department | Seniority Level | Why This Role Matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dean of Engineering | Academic Leadership | C-Level / Executive | Owns strategic priorities, institutional investment, and major partnership decisions |
| 2 | Associate Dean / Assistant Dean | Academic Affairs / Student Success / Research | VP / Director | Drives implementation, pilots, and budget-aligned program decisions |
| 3 | Department Chair / Department Head | Academic Department | Director / Head | Influences curriculum choices, teaching systems, faculty tools, and equipment needs |
| 4 | Director of Academic Technology | IT / Digital Learning | Director | Key buyer for platforms, integrations, analytics, and digital delivery tools |
| 5 | Director of Laboratories / Lab Manager | Labs / Facilities | Manager / Director | Relevant for instrumentation, lab modernization, safety, and workflow solutions |
| 6 | Director of Assessment / Accreditation | Assessment / Institutional Effectiveness | Director | Important for outcomes tracking, reporting, continuous improvement, and accreditation support |
| 7 | Procurement Manager / Strategic Sourcing Manager | Procurement / Purchasing | Manager | Controls vendor onboarding, contracting, sourcing compliance, and purchasing workflows |
| 8 | Program Director / Undergraduate Studies Director | Academic Programs | Director | Influences student engagement, curriculum tools, and teaching model adoption |
| 9 | Director of Corporate Relations / Industry Partnerships | External Relations / Partnerships | Director | Useful for sponsorships, workforce-development programs, and research-commercialization partnerships |
| 10 | Faculty Lead / Principal Investigator | Research / Teaching | Individual Contributor / Influencer | Often initiates product trials and internal advocacy even when not the final buyer |
| Priority | Apollo Industry | Why It Fits the Event | Best Buyer Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Higher Education | Core attendee base consists of universities and engineering colleges | Academic leadership, engineering departments, lab and curriculum buyers |
| 2 | Education Management | Relevant for education systems, consortiums, and managed academic programs | Program administration, student success, and operational platforms |
| 3 | E-Learning | Strong fit for digital courseware and hybrid teaching models | Online labs, assessment, instructional content, faculty development |
| 4 | Information Technology & Services | Academic IT and campus technology teams are relevant stakeholders | Integrations, analytics, security, and enterprise deployment |
| 5 | Computer Software | Engineering education relies heavily on simulation, design, and learning software | Course delivery, student practice, data reporting, lab software |
| 6 | Mechanical or Industrial Engineering | Many participating programs are directly tied to engineering disciplines | Department-level targeting and industry-academia collaboration |
| 7 | Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing | Relevant for corporate education partners, lab suppliers, and engineering employers | Sponsorships, recruiting pipelines, instrumentation partnerships |
| 8 | Industrial Automation | Automation-oriented companies commonly support engineering labs and training | Lab modernization, skills training, workforce readiness |
| 9 | Research | Research centers and academic innovation groups are relevant attendees | Research tools, data platforms, collaboration software |
| 10 | Professional Training & Coaching | Relevant for engineering faculty training, upskilling, and certification support | Faculty development, leadership training, instructional improvement |
| 11 | Government Administration | Relevant where public institutions, grants, and funded engineering initiatives intersect | Public university systems, grant-backed programs, STEM initiatives |
| 12 | Computer Hardware | Useful for lab infrastructure and classroom technology vendors | Lab devices, workstations, instrumentation, edge hardware |
| Metric | Figure | Status | Source / Basis | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated total footfall | Several thousand attendees | Estimated | Historical scale of ASEE annual conferences and market positioning | Attendance figure not publicly confirmed by the organizer |
| Exhibitor count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | Current-year public materials reviewed | Exposition is a standard component of the event, but exact count was not verified |
| Buyer count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | Organizer has not publicly segmented buyer totals in reviewed materials | Academic decision-makers are the core commercial audience, but no formal buyer metric was located |
| Speaker count | Not publicly confirmed in this report | Unconfirmed | Conference agenda and paper program typically contain numerous presenters | Large multi-track program implies broad presenter participation |
| Sponsor count | Not publicly confirmed in this report | Unconfirmed | Depends on final event sponsorship package and exposition participation | Useful to verify from official prospectus or sponsor page |
| Historical attendance | Several thousand | Historical / prior-year evidence | ASEE annual conference reputation and prior editions | Best used as directional planning data, not a confirmed 2026 count |
| Focus Area | Typical Buyer Need | Buyer Engagement Opportunity | Relevant Supplier Offering |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering curriculum development | Improve teaching quality, relevance, and learning outcomes | Department-level demos, pilot programs, faculty workshops | Courseware, curriculum mapping, learning content, simulation tools |
| Student engagement and retention | Increase persistence, participation, and workforce readiness | Outcome-focused discussions with program directors and associate deans | Advising, analytics, engagement platforms, assessment tools |
| Lab modernization | Upgrade equipment, improve access, support hands-on learning | Exhibit-floor equipment demos and technical consultations | Lab hardware, instrumentation, remote labs, safety systems |
| Digital learning and academic technology | Scale instruction, hybrid delivery, and data-driven teaching | Meetings with academic IT and instructional leaders | LMS-adjacent tools, SaaS platforms, analytics dashboards, integration services |
| Assessment and accreditation | Streamline outcomes reporting and continuous improvement | Proof-of-value conversations tied to ABET-style evidence needs | Assessment software, reporting workflows, survey systems, data repositories |
| Industry-academia collaboration | Improve recruiting pipelines, sponsored projects, and applied learning | Partnership conversations with deans and corporate-relations leaders | Recruitment services, sponsorship models, experiential learning platforms |
| Research and innovation support | Enable faculty productivity, data handling, and interdisciplinary collaboration | Research workflow and technical capability positioning | Research software, cloud tools, data systems, specialized equipment |
| Factor | Assessment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer relevance | High | Audience is specialized and aligned to engineering education purchasing and influence paths |
| Decision-maker availability | High | Deans, chairs, program leaders, and institutional influencers are central to the conference profile |
| Data collection potential | Medium | Public attendee lists may be limited, but session programs, speaker rosters, and exhibitor ecosystems are useful alternatives |
| Apollo targeting potential | Very High | University engineering, academic IT, labs, and procurement roles are targetable with clear title logic |
| Geographic targeting potential | High | Works well for U.S.-wide campaigns and can be narrowed to Southeast or research-intensive institutions |
| Best outreach approach | High | Use consultative outreach focused on outcomes, faculty adoption, accreditation value, student success, or lab modernization |
| Overall lead quality | High | Very strong if the offer is relevant to higher education, engineering programs, research workflows, or academic technology |
| Best use case | High | Best for lead generation, exhibitor targeting, institutional outreach, and decision-maker mapping |
| Limitations / risks | Medium | Procurement cycles can be long, budget ownership may be distributed, and public attendee transparency may be limited |
| Filter Type | Recommended Filters | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Apollo industries | Higher Education; Education Management; E-Learning; Information Technology & Services; Computer Software; Research; Professional Training & Coaching | Concentrates on the most relevant institutional and solution-buyer categories |
| Departments | Education, Operations, Information Technology, Engineering, Purchasing, Research, Program Management | Maps to academic leadership, implementation, procurement, and technical evaluation |
| Seniority | C-Level, VP, Director, Head, Manager | Captures strategic approvers and operational owners |
| Job titles | Dean, Associate Dean, Assistant Dean, Department Chair, Department Head, Program Director, Director of Academic Technology, Director of Laboratories, Lab Manager, Director of Assessment, Procurement Manager, Strategic Sourcing Manager, Director of Corporate Relations | Builds a high-fit decision-maker and influencer list |
| Geography | United States; prioritize North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Virginia, Texas, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Arizona, Massachusetts, Indiana | Balances host-region relevance with national engineering education coverage |
| Employee size | 501–1,000; 1,001–5,000; 5,001–10,000; 10,001+ | Large institutions and complex university systems are most likely to support meaningful budgets |
| Keywords | engineering education, college of engineering, undergraduate engineering, ABET, instructional technology, engineering lab, student success, experiential learning, curriculum innovation, faculty development | Improves relevance where industry classification alone is too broad |
| Technologies, if relevant | LMS, analytics, simulation software, lab management systems, classroom technology | Helpful if selling integrations, software, or campus technology solutions |
| Revenue range, if relevant | Large public and private institutions; use broad revenue filters where available | Supports prioritization of better-funded institutions |
| Company type | Universities, colleges, research institutions, STEM education organizations, academic consortia | Ensures outreach stays buyer-side rather than exhibitor-only |
| Source | Type | What It Verified | Reliability |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASEE Official Website | Official organizer website | Organizer identity, conference brand, association positioning | High |
| ASEE Annual Conference Page | Official event page | Event identity, date framework, conference purpose, official event positioning | High |
| ASEE Conference Proceedings / Papers Archive | Official historical conference record | Prior-year institutional participation evidence and university engagement patterns | High for prior-year participation evidence |
| City of Charlotte Official Website | Official city source | City and state verification | High |
| User-supplied event details | Provided event brief | Start date, end date, city, country, and broad event scope | Medium; used where exact public venue detail was not independently confirmed in this report |
🎯 Selling to this event's audience? Get a free tailored buyer list
Tell us your work email and our AI instantly builds a buyer list matched to ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition 2026 — the best‑fit companies to target, the exact decision‑maker job titles, and the industry filters that fit what you sell.